squiddan24 squiddan24
  • 22-09-2020
  • History
contestada

Which of the following describes an advantage primary sources have over secondary sources for historians

Respuesta :

chickenbutt787
chickenbutt787 chickenbutt787
  • 22-09-2020

Answer:

There is no answers (a, b, c, d) but here we go!

Explanation:

An advantage of a primary source is that it was written by a person who experienced the event that occurred at that time, so like a soldier's journal, while a secondary source is based upon research that might not be true, and written by a person who didn't witness that event.

Answer Link
1047654
1047654 1047654
  • 26-08-2021

Answer:

the answer is D.

Explanation:

Answer Link

Otras preguntas

Is the blood in the aorta, left ventricle and pulmonary artery oxygenated or deoxygenated?
cual es la mitad de 17
ABCD is a parallelogram. AC = 9cm, DC = 11cm, angle DAC = 100'. Calculate the area of the parallelogram
another word for not surprisingly
What different opinions emerged toward Henry clays compromise of 1850
A race is 10 kilometers long. Markers will be placed at the beginning and end of the race course and at each 500 meter mark. How many markers are needed to mark
A worker in an assembly line takes 2 hours to produce 120 parts. At that rate how many parts can she produce in 9 hours?
A ball weighs 200n on earth is moved to a planet that has a mass four times larger and a diameter three times larger than that of earth. After the ball is moved
what force helps a ship float?
How do you think that the food eaten by early humans affected the ways that they lived?